1964

[tekken1096]

i was saying that back when 0.6.3 was out http://www.emuxhaven.net/iB_html/non-cgi/emoticons/smile.gif

but now, theres no contest http://www.emuxhaven.net/iB_html/non-cgi/emoticons/smile.gif 1964 r0x and ownz the n64 scene O_o

[brightman]

Yup, i remember that... http://www.emuxhaven.net/iB_html/non-cgi/emoticons/wink.gif But no one's going to argue with you now... http://www.emuxhaven.net/iB_html/non-cgi/emoticons/smile.gif

[The Player of Doom]

I can't agree with that. 1964 is still second best.
Pj has gameshark activator keys support and (maybe) more cheats. It also has a better cheat dialog. It puts the cheats into categories which is very nice.

But 1964 is overall very good now.

[Rodney Jason]

lets not choose.....
lets just use BOTH!!



Last edited by Rodney Jason at May 27 2002,09:56

[Cero]

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (Rodney Jason @ May 27 2002,00:55)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">lets not choose.....
lets just use BOTH!![/b][/quote]
Rodney has the right idea here ppl, no need to limit urself to just 1 emu...

[emuxhaven]

A little quote from the authors of 1964 , they posted this on the emutalk boards :

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote </td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">0.8.3 removed
I've removed 0.8.3 from the 1964 website. Too many new problems unfortunately went undetected until after release.

- 98 crash if more than 21 roms in the rom browser.
- Slowdown still not fixed.
- Freezes after a while.
- Cannot view in windowed mode.

We do not have the time to fix these problems right now, but rest assured they will be fixed. Please use 0.7.3. Sorry to ruin your weekend. Let the flaming begin.[/b][/quote]

I guess there are too many bugs in it...

uhum Long live Ultrat um Ultrahle o and Pj64 !

[tekken1096]

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (emuxhaven @ May 27 2002,13:42)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">A little quote from the authors of 1964 , they posted this on the emutalk boards :

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote </td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">0.8.3 removed
I've removed 0.8.3 from the 1964 website. Too many new problems unfortunately went undetected until after release.

- 98 crash if more than 21 roms in the rom browser.
- Slowdown still not fixed.
- Freezes after a while.
- Cannot view in windowed mode.

We do not have the time to fix these problems right now, but rest assured they will be fixed. Please use 0.7.3. Sorry to ruin your weekend. Let the flaming begin.[/b][/quote]

I guess there are too many bugs in it...

uhum Long live Ultrat um Ultrahle o and Pj64 ![/b][/quote]
i think i know y ur saying Ultrahle http://www.emuxhaven.net/iB_html/non-cgi/emoticons/wink.gif

[goldeneye]

Personally I think that 1964 is 3rd.

UltraHle is first http://www.emuxhaven.net/iB_html/non-cgi/emoticons/wink.gif b/c of speed (no. 1 on the emu scene)

PJ64 second, very stable, relatively fast, compatability nice, great gfx, and sound, love the input plugin platform

1964->faster than Uhle, very high compatability, uses same plugins as pj, but, it is just to unstable for me, sorry 1964, maybe when the fixed version comes out, it'll move up to no. 1

[brightman]

some speed issues I did noticed, but none of the other problems are here http://www.emuxhaven.net/iB_html/non-cgi/emoticons/smile.gif

UltraHLE is nothing special in my computer...

[Reina]

I use only 1964 and had only twice ever refered to Pj64
Pj64 is to "Different" for me...

[Rodney Jason]

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (goldeneye @ May 27 2002,13:07)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">Personally I think that 1964 is 3rd.

UltraHle is first http://www.emuxhaven.net/iB_html/non-cgi/emoticons/wink.gif b/c of speed (no. 1 on the emu scene)[/b][/quote]
UltaHle isnt the fastest emultor!
Corn is &nbsp;http://www.emuxhaven.net/iB_html/non-cgi/emoticons/cwm2.gif
But corn sUx

[The Player of Doom]

I don't know if these problems with 1964 will occour for me, since I've not had much problems with it. The small time I did run it, it had no problems. And since I've got XP, there's no problem of crashing.

UltraHLE: face it--it's dead and low comptability!
Corn: Don't make me think of it! Very poor compability and gfx...

In short: Pj64 -- 1st, 1964 -- 2nd

[Rodney Jason]

speed isnt a problem for me i almost always get a smooth 60 fps

[brightman]

I get it in many games too, but some i get at 35 fps and some at 45 fps for PJ64.

[The Player of Doom]

I get full speed in all emus except in apollo.

[InFiniTy]

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (brightman @ May 29 2002,09:54)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">http://www.emuxhaven.net/iB_html/non-cgi/emoticons/wow.gif7--></span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (The Player of Doom @ May 29 2002,05http://www.emuxhaven.net/iB_html/non-cgi/emoticons/wow.gif7)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">I get full speed in all emus except in apollo.[/b][/quote]
Me too... But in what games? I am sure you don't get full speed with ALL games in PJ64. That's what I meant. I get better speed in many slower games in 1964 than in PJ64.[/b][/quote]
thats true, but in 1964 i get sometimes more break in sound

[brightman]

Which plugin do you use?

[tekken1096]

give us ur specs while ur at it

[InFiniTy]

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (tekken1096 @ May 29 2002,18:53)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">give us ur specs while ur at it[/b][/quote]
nevermind, my specs are really bad...so i guess its jus me.
soundblaster
intel 810e
128 mgs ram
i think i use the zilmar one, can't remember...i'm basically done with n64 emualtion...its gba all the way

[brightman]

yeah Azimer's plugin works better with 1964 (zilmar's plugin isn't exactly good)

[brightman]

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (The Player of Doom @ May 31 2002,03:16)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">I get full speed on ALL games (you heard me), in pj. Zelda MM is pendling a little on the edge in town, but that's all.
[/b][/quote]
Pssh... Yeah right. Full speed in the 5 games you have doesn't mean it's full speed in ALL games. Some games do not run at full speed with a 2.4 GHz computer.

[Nemesis.y2k]

FOR GODS SAKE
WHY HAVE A BEST THAY ARE ALL GOOD
IF ANY OF YOU CAN DO BETTER THEN DO IT AND STOP *****ING,

THE PROGRAMMERS OF THE EMULATORS WILL SOON GET FED UP OF PEOPLE RUNNING THERE WORK DOWN AND LEAVE,

AND THEN WOT WILL YOU ***** ABOUT?

[The Player of Doom]

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (brightman @ May 31 2002,16:10)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE"></span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (The Player of Doom @ May 31 2002,03:16)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">I get full speed on ALL games (you heard me), in pj. Zelda MM is pendling a little on the edge in town, but that's all.
[/b][/quote]
Pssh... Yeah right. Full speed in the 5 games you have doesn't mean it's full speed in ALL games. Some games do not run at full speed with a 2.4 GHz computer.[/b][/quote]
ALL games that I have!

[brightman]

Duh, you must have very little games in that case http://www.emuxhaven.net/iB_html/non-cgi/emoticons/wink.gif

[Rodney Jason]

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (The Player of Doom @ June 05 2002,00:10)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">I get full speed on ALL games (you heard me), in pj. Zelda MM is pendling a little on the edge in town, but that's all.[/b][/quote]
I get Full speed im many of the 1000's of games i have &nbsp;http://www.emuxhaven.net/iB_html/non-cgi/emoticons/tounge.gif &nbsp;but it might be just my comp
anyway some games will always run slow

[InFiniTy]

*huh* how did this all start

[brightman]

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (Rodney Jason @ June 07 2002,11:57)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">anyway some games will always run slow[/b][/quote]
Exactly my point. http://www.emuxhaven.net/iB_html/non-cgi/emoticons/smile.gif And 1964 runs those faster--for me anyway.

[The Player of Doom]

Well, mmm, yes, I do have a very little amount of games. But still, at my specs, even the most requiring games runs at full speed. Except at some, and some special moments, like in the Mario Party games.